PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Years of mechanism: 2007 2008 2009
Women's land rights are of special concern in Rwanda where most agricultural activities, including both
cultivation and marketing, are conducted by women and where 33.9% of households are female-headed
(2005 RDHS-III). Women's rights to land are precarious and complicated by such customary practices as
land management and ownership, the predominance of informal marriages or consensual unions, and
polygamy. Despite a relatively progressive inheritance law, patrilineal inheritance patterns continue in
Rwanda. These practices, in conjunction with the acute land shortage, translate to fewer land parcels
passing to women. Women who do have access to land through their household sometimes lose their
access to that land in the event of the breakdown of the household (by way of widowhood, abuse,
abandonment, banishment, and polygamy). When women lose their access and rights to land, these
women frequently are forced to turn to higher-risk behaviors that may increase the incidence of HIV/AIDS.
According to the 2005 RDHS-III, 33.2% of widowed women reported being dispossessed of property.
Rwanda's 2003 Constitution, recent Land Policy, 2005 Organic Land Law, and Inheritance Law all promote
and establish land-related legal rights for women and prohibit gender discrimination. However, the
difficulties and challenges inherent in clarifying and implementing any law, along with the cultural and
informal realities that govern gender relations in Rwanda, make it a challenge to achieve the goals set out in
the Constitution and underlying laws.
The EP will provide support to this USAID-funded land reform activity to include a short-term technical
specialist on gender and land to incorporate gender-specific provisions within the new land laws, decrees,
and regulations. That person will also help to amend existing laws to: reflect and attempt to accommodate
the slowly changing reality of customary and informal practices; improve the likelihood that women can
retain land when household events occur (such as HIV-infection or death due to AIDS) that might otherwise
divest them of their land; provide for more universal land titling to women, including those living in informal
consensual unions; and better provide for women to obtain land by way of market transactions. Taken
together, this assistance will improve women's ability to access and retain needed productive land
resources and viable sources of livelihoods, and to lower the need to engage in high-risk behavior as a
survival strategy. One significant outcome should be the prevention of high-risk behavior and, by extension,
it should reduce the incidence of HIV infection among Rwandans.
The direct output of this activity is to facilitate the passage of legislation that would advance gender equity
for PLHIV.
This activity addresses the key legislative issue of gender. This activity advances the Rwanda EP five-year
strategy by improving the quality of life for all PLHIV, especially HIV+ women.