PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Years of mechanism: 2007 2008 2009
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION Abt Associates proposes to conduct a Service Provision Assessment (SPA) to support the roll out of HIV/AIDS services in Nigeria. The HIV/AIDS-related services that will be assessed include: testing capability, care and support services, antiretroviral therapy, post-exposure prophylaxis, prevention of mother-to-child transmission and youth-friendly services. With the opportunity that the Emergency Plan and other international financial resources provide to rapidly scale up comprehensive prevention, care, and treatment services nationally, institutional capacity in the health sector will be a critical factor determining the success or failure of scaling up HIV/AIDS services in Nigeria. The SPA will be conducted in a representative sample of facilities (about 350) including hospitals, health centers, maternity homes, dispensaries, clinics, and stand-alone Voluntary Counseling and Testing centers across the country. Data and information on the provision of HIV/AIDS services will be collected from public, non-governmental, and faith-based organizations on the capacity of their facilities to deliver these services and the quality of care provided to clients seeking these services. This activity will provide critical information on the capacity of the health sector to provide both basic and advanced HIV/AIDS services and the availability of record keeping systems for monitoring HIV/AIDS services. The SPA is directly linked to other data collection activities such as the human resource assessment and service availability mapping that inform policy makers and managers to develop a multi-pronged strategy to assist expansion of quality integrated and sustainable HIV/AIDS services, building on previous work done within the sector. Health 20/20 and FMOH partners will use this and other data to prepare a report of the current institutional capacity for delivering quality HIV/AIDS services in Nigeria and to develop national recommendations addressing the various capacity issues identified. We will draw on the materials and experiences of similar evaluations in other PEPFAR-supported countries.
