PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Years of mechanism: 2007 2008 2009
These funds will be provided to the International Laboratory Branch Partners Consortium in order to
continue the American Society of Microbiologists' (ASM) technical assistance to the Namibia Institute of
Pathology (NIP) to improve TB laboratory capacity. ASM has provided short- and long-term technical
advisors to work alongside NIP staff at the main laboratory in Windhoek to improve their proficiency with TB
diagnostic testing, including on-the-job training on TB-related laboratory equipment and infection control
practices. In 2008, ASM will expand their support to peripheral NIP laboratories and will work alongside
NIP managers and technologists to secure accreditation for NIP's TB laboratory. ASM has worked to
strengthen the TB laboratory at NIP since 2007; these funds were previously reflected in the "Laboratory
Services" program area. These activities leverage ongoing TB expertise and resources from the MoHSS,
the Global Fund, the TB Control Assistance Program (TBCAP), and other organizations.
This is an ongoing activity in FY08. The CDC GAP International Laboratory Branch has established a
consortium consisting of four US partners with laboratory expertise. The partners include the Association of
Public Health Laboratories (APHL), American Society of Clinical Pathology (ASCP), the American Society
for Microbiology (ASM) and the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). ASM's efforts are reflected
under the HVTB program area as primary areas of focus are tuberculosis smear microscopy, culture and
drug susceptibility testing.
An NIP laboratory training needs assessment was completed in FY06, and recommended workshops and
consultations started during FY07. In FY07, an in-service training Lab Unit was established within NIP to
provide training on new technologies as well as refresher trainings. The ILB partners will continue to provide
assistance to fill the remaining training gaps identified as well play a key role in training the trainers (TOT).
The presenting partner was selected depending on the following priorities that were identified during the
laboratory assessment and continue to be challenges. Priority areas for training and consultation in FY08
are laboratory and leadership management including strategic planning for the national laboratory system
(APHL); training on bio-monitoring assays such as CD4 methods and instrumentation, chemistry and
hematology, development of training resource center (ASCP); preparation for laboratory accreditation,
assessment of the NIP's quality management system practices through an active gap analysis and
effectiveness assessment program, and standardized laboratory methodology and quality assurance
(CLSI). The ILB consortium partners will provide the technical trainings while ITECH manages the logistics
of the trainings to be conducted. Equipments and reagents procurement for the trainings will be covered by
NIP through their cooperative agreement with USG. In FY07, in collaboration with the CDC Office of Global
Health (OGH) Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program (FELTP) and the South African National
Health Laboratory System (SA-NHLS), the GAP International Laboratory Branch (ILB) and TB/OI/HIV
Program Team (T/HP) proposes to establish a TB/HIV/OI Regional Laboratory Training Center in South
Africa with the explicit mission of training and certifying personnel in standardized techniques and promoting
EQA for:TB AFB smear microscopy (for both light and fluorescent microscopy), Establishment of EQA
programs for TB AFB smear microscopy, Mycobacterium culture (using both manual and automated
methods) , First-line drug susceptibility testing (DST), OI/STI diagnosis, HIV Diagnosis and monitoring and
EQA. This regional laboratory training center will be used as appropriate to complement Namibia training
needs.