PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Years of mechanism: 2007 2008 2009
This is a new activity for FY07. The USG GAP International Laboratory Branch has established a CDC/GAP ILB Consortium consisting of 4 US partners with laboratory expertise. The partners include the Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL), American Society of Clinical Pathology (ASCP), the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) and the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). An NIP laboratory training needs assessment was completed in FY06, and recommended workshops and consultations will be organized in FY07. The presenting partner will be selected depending on the following priorities that were identified during the laboratory assessment. Priority areas for training and consultation are laboratory management including strategic planning for the national laboratory system (APHL); training on biomonitoring assays such as CD4 methods and instrumentation, chemistry and hematology (ASCP); OI focusing on tuberculosis smear microscopy, culture and drug susceptibility testing (ASM); and standardized laboratory methodology and quality assurance (CLSI). These activities will not support equipment or reagent procurement, items that are included within the direct-funding mechanism to the NIP through the new Cooperative Agreement with the USG. See NIP/Lab Infrastructure #7337.
