PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Years of mechanism: 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Principle activities to be carried out in support of PFIP 1.1 Improve the availability and quality of care and treatment services, and PFIP 2.3. Strengthen national system of workforce development for improved service delivery building capacity among Vietnamese nurses.
Geographic coverage: throughout Vietnam
Target population: primary population is nurses who care for HIV/AIDS and infectious diseases; secondary population is patients with infectious diseases.
This activity is continuation with refined programmatic focus on: improved quality of care through stronger clinical management and enhanced as well as relevant training for broader application & sustainability.
COP11 key activities:
o Providing technical assistance and coaching to middle and higher level military nursing & medical leader.
o Providing teaching workshop for nursing faculty in military and selected civilian nursing school/nursing department of universities on chronic illness management, infection control
o Supporting revision of current nursing curriculum as needed
o Providing training and technical assistance for clinical management, HIV care and support, patient-focused practices, general health assessment, standard precaution/ Infection control
o Support to clinical sites: maintaining patient-focused care in Infection disease department (operational cost, commodities)
o Supporting travel expenses for implementing staff, at 4 sites, to attend training/ workshops)
o Maintaining TA and monitoring of care-related activities
Budget: $270,000
Principle activities to be carried out in support of PFIP 2.3. Strengthen national system of workforce development for improved service delivery building capacity among Vietnamese clinical health care providers with improved infection control program management and monitoring
Target population: clinical healthcare workers (HCW) in both civilian and military health care settings
This activity is continuation with refined programmatic focus on: improved quality of care through enhanced clinical infection control management
o Providing support and technical assistance for development of the training curricula on certification of infection control program officer, including pilot training
o Providing technical assistance and coaching to the National Infection Control Technical Working Group for the development of necessary guidelines
o Supporting consolidation of current guidelines for the development of the national infection control guideline package and related training curriculum
o Implementing model infection control programs in selected civilian and military hospitals, which will utilize the newly developed guideline and infection control program officer certification program
Budget: $230,000
