PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Years of mechanism: 2010 2011
Automated Directive System (ADS) 203.3.6.1 requires that end of project evaluations should be conducted when there is a distinct and clear management need to address an issue. This activity will undertake 6-8 mid-term and/or end of project evaluations for USAID PEFPAR projects. End of project evaluations will focus on those that are scheduled to end in FY2010. The purpose of the evaluations is to extract lessons that would benefit the USG/Uganda Team and GOU partner institutions with future programming either through extending or modifying current agreements, or ensuring that key lessons learned are built into existing or newly designed activities. Secondly, these evaluations will provide critical information to USAID and the USG in improving program design, management and implementation. The evaluation will also distill lessons learned about program implementation that will have a bearing on scaling up HIV/AIDS intervention and replication of similar intervention nationwide. Resources are requested to conduct program evaluations for key USAID supported projects including: End of project evaluation for "Food and Nutrition Interventions for People Living with HIV/AIDS NuLife Project", End of project evaluation of the "Capacity Project",
JCRC organizational effectiveness assessment, indigenous partner capacity assessments for JCRC, TASO, IRCU, Hospice, and ICOBI. The remaining are TBD pending PEPFAR priorities for ongoing programming.
Automated Directive System (ADS) 203.3.6.1 requires that end of project evaluations should be conducted when there is a distinct and clear management need to address an issue. This activity will undertake 6-8 mid-term and/or end of project evaluations for USAID PEFPAR projects. End of project evaluations will focus on those that are scheduled to end in FY2010. The purpose of the evaluations is to extract lessons that would benefit the USG/Uganda Team and GOU partner institutions with future programming either through extending or modifying current agreements, or ensuring that key lessons learned are built into existing or newly designed activities. Secondly, these evaluations will provide critical information to USAID and the USG in improving program design, management and implementation. The evaluation will also distill lessons learned about program implementation that will have a bearing on scaling up HIV/AIDS intervention and replication of similar intervention nationwide. Resources are requested to conduct program evaluations for key USAID supported projects including: End of project evaluation for "Food and Nutrition Interventions for People Living with HIV/AIDS NuLife Project", End of project evaluation of the "Capacity Project", JCRC organizational effectiveness assessment, indigenous partner capacity assessments for JCRC, TASO, IRCU, Hospice, and ICOBI. The remaining are TBD pending PEPFAR priorities for ongoing programming.
