PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Years of mechanism: 2008 2009
TITLE: Dissemination of results of Measure Evaluation OVC PHE
NEED and COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE:
ACCOMPLISHMENTS: MEASURE Evaluation has designed and coordinated targeted evaluation studies
for three Orphans and Vulnerable Children (OVC) program models in Tanzania including the Salvation
Army in Mbeya region, Tunajali in Iringa region, and PACT in Tabora region. The main objectives of these
studies include: 1.To assess the effectiveness of the different interventions in terms of program models,
components, costs, and outcomes in improving the well-being of OVC; and 2. Identify and disseminate best
practices relating to improving the effectiveness and increasing the scale of interventions to stakeholders.
The data collection, case studies, outcomes, and costing analyses are still ongoing and are expected to be
completed by August 2008.
ACTIVITIES: Program activities will include collaborating with the Government of Tanzania (GOT), United
States Government (USG) and OVC Implementing Partners (IPG), and other key stakeholders to evaluate
best practices from OVC- targeted evaluations funded in FY 2006 and FY 2007 to improve programs. Sub-
activities include the promotion of data dissemination and information utilization (DDIU) in consultation with
stakeholders, including the National Network of Children (NNOC) and the IPG, and to disseminate results
from the three evaluation studies through a series of workshops with various stakeholders at the national
and district levels in Tanzania. The program will identify a local research organization to conduct focus
group discussions with OVC caregivers and children of each of the three programs to explore and
understand the findings from the impact evaluations and develop recommendations to improve programs.
In addition, the partner will support the GOT and USG on building the research and M&E capacity among
OVC program partners in order to encourage more targeted evaluations for their individual programs. This
will include sharing the tools developed and helping to adapt these tools specifically to their programs and
providing continued technical assistance as needed in conducting these evaluations. This integration of
study results will improve programs and the national standard of OVC care. It will also help in brokering
productive partnerships between the USG and other donor groups, and with relevant UN agencies, to
increase field capacity for research and M&E of OVC programs at the national and local levels. This will
encourage further program evaluations to address OVC issues.
LINKAGES: The program will link with the GOT Department of Social Welfare (DSW), the IPG, and the
Institute of Social Work for the improvement of services, national standards, and training based on study
findings.
CHECK BOXES:
M&E: M&E approach will be in three parts:
1) input and budget tracking;
2) activities and output tracking; and
3) outcomes tracking. Input and output tracking will be achieved through financial and activity quarterly
reporting respectively. A financial database will be used to generate a financial quarterly report. Outcomes
will be tracked via an annual report based on overall project results.
SUSTAINAIBLITY: Overall, strengthening of in-country human capacity in strategic information is expected
to increase potential for sustainable, quality programs. Other crucial efforts that will lead to sustainability
include working in partnership with GOT agencies such as TACAIDS, National Bureau of Statistics,
Zanzibar Aids Commission, and other local organizations. Every effort will be made to work within the
national agenda including support to strengthen national information systems.