PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Years of mechanism: 2012 2013
UNICEF's on-going effort in integrating Child Justice into the Justice Sector Reform has three key components namely: coordination; capacity building; and access to justice. The current project aims to achieve the following: 1) increased sector coordination and development of sectoral policies, legislation and plans in the justice sector; 2) strengthened judiciary training and research capabilities; and 3) increased access to justice and respect for human rights for the vulnerable. In specific, under the result 1, UNICEF plans to facilitate involvement of Social Welfare Sector in the Justice Sector Reform and ensure that child justice issues remain visible, and that social welfare actors who are critical to child justice work are included. UNICEF will work with government and local actors to identify appropriate interdisciplinary child justice specific coordination mechanisms. This may include a focal point model, sub-groups or child justice advisory groups, all of which would be directly linked to broader justice coordination bodies. Under the result 2, in lieu of setting up and managing separate child justice trainings, UNICEF will work closely with national counterparts, UNODC and other partners to integrate child justice into training curriculum and programmes (both pre-service, in-service phase) of justice, prison and police personnel. The priority will be given to Specialized Childrens Units of Police and Family Courts who will be trained on key concepts of child development, effective communication with children, and ethical issues specific to children and others. Under result 3, UNICEF will support child friendly legal assistance and establishing specialized child units within the Nigerian Police Force.
increased sector coordination and development of sectoral policies, legislation and plans in the justice sector; 2) strengthened judiciary training and research capabilities; and 3) increased access to justice and respect for human rights for the vulnerable