PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Years of mechanism: 2012 2013
In August 2011, HCI led a QI coaches training for the FMWASD and other stakeholders (including USG, implementing partners, UNICEF, and AONN representatives). In September 2011, a hands-on training was also conducted to provide an opportunity for FMWASD staff and other stakeholders trained during the coaches training to gain practical experience around what they had learned and adapt the information to their own local context and situation. At the state level, the TWG and participating implementing partners have been supported to choose states where each will be lead agencies supporting the pilot process. The IPs and local organizations are supported to facilitate the formation and strengthening of OVC state technical working groups and QI teams by the State Ministries of Women Affairs in the various pilot states. These groups serve to provide oversight for the implementation and coordination of care and support programs for vulnerable children in each state while also providing support and oversight forthe piloting of standards at the state level.Based on the results of HCI activities thus far, HCI proposes to provide the following SOW for COP 2012:1) Facilitate national endorsement of the Standards that are integrated within a national strategy response. 2) Scale-up implementation of the OVC Standards of Care. 3) Support the country-leadership role in improving quality care for OVC programs to mitigate the impact of HIV/AIDS on most vulnerable families and children. 4) Strengthen capacity of government and partners at national, state and local levels for provision of quality services to vulnerable children and caregivers. 5) Create a community of shared learning across all OVC stakeholders.
Labour , workshop, travels fringe benefit
