PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
PMTCT one time plus-up funds are being added to support:
Ten percent of the proposed plus-up funds will support national efforts to improve access and uptake to PMTCT, pediatric HIV care, and infant feeding services through a harmonized and integrated monitoring and evaluation system and operations research to identify barriers to uptake of services. Cost information on pediatric HIV/AIDS care and treatment is limited, though Zambia partners have used several approaches for adult care and treatment. Understanding and documenting the reasons and cost of PMTCT failures will assist in advocacy for improvements in coverage.
Resources requested under this area will be utilized to conduct operations research to identify areas of program implementation which are succeeding, and those which need further assistance. Funds will also be utilized to identify gaps in service provision and to gain a greater understanding of health seeking behavior around PMTCT services.
One-time funding will be considered for:
5.1 Assessment of complete costs of care for infected children, including ART costs, inpatient and outpatient services costs, with modeling of long-term survival and cost scenarios;
5.2 Cost-benefit analysis comparing the additional costs of earlier HAART for pregnant women or complex PMTCT regimes based on pediatric cost data;
5.3 Qualitative and anthropological analysis of missed opportunities for PMTCT and PMTCT failures across the cascade, including the social, cultural, laboratory and clinical factors that contribute to infant infection; and
5.4 Analysis and dissemination of information using Next Generation PMTCT indicators to assess program effectiveness including the impact of COP funding increases for operational costs and these one-time plus-up funds.
+G14
