PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
ACTIVITY HAS BEEN MODIFIED IN THE FOLLOWING WAYS FROM COP 2008:
SECONDARY CROSS-CUTTING BUDGET ATTRIBUTIONS
Through its existing partnerships under centrally funded mechanisms, this activity will support cross cutting
budget attributions to education through payment of school levies and procurement of school uniforms for
target OVC in the amount of US$ 56,095. An additional 11,219 of the partners' budget will be attributed to
waste and sanitation while $33,765 will be spent on economic empowerment activities to facilitate food
security in households that are looking after OVC.
COP 2008
1. LIST OF RELATED ACTIVITIES
This activity links to activities in counseling and testing, ARV services, and palliative care.
2. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
The goals of the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) include care for 10 million
HIV/AIDS affected individuals, including orphans and vulnerable children (OVC). In November 2003 and
again in March 2004, USAID issued an Annual Program Statement (APS) "To Provide Support to Orphans
and Vulnerable Children Affected by HIV/AIDS" to expand and strengthen care and support efforts under
PEPFAR. Specifically, it asked for proposals to increase care and support to orphans and other vulnerable
children (OVC) and adolescents affected by HIV in two or more of the focus countries under the Presidential
Initiative. Eight Cooperative Agreements (CA) were awarded that have been implementing programs in
Kenya. These include, Associazione volontari per il servizio Internazionale (AVSI), Care International,
Catholic Relief Services, Christian Aid (Community Based care of OVC), Christian Children's Fund
(Weaving the safety net), Hope Worldwide (ANCHOR), Plan International (Breaking Barriers) and World
Concern (Support to OVC affected by HIV/AIDS). The key objectives of these OVC programs are:
1)To provide comprehensive and compassionate care to improve the quality of life for orphans and other
vulnerable children.
2)To strengthen and improve the quality of OVC programs through the implementation, evaluation and
replication of best practices in the area of OVC programming.
In view of the fact that various Cooperative Agreements for these 8 projects were coming to an end at
varying months in early 2010, USAID Washington decided to extend all of the Track 1 OVC to a common
end date of June 30, 2010. The purpose behind this decision was to build in adequate transition time for
these programs to build sustainability and work with country teams to ensure that no beneficiaries in need of
continued services are completely dropped at the end of these projects. At the same time, the AIDS,
Population and Health Integrated Assistance Project (APHIA II), the mechanism through which PEPFAR
programs are implemented will be ending in September 2010. This activity will facilitate a continuation of
service provision to the 83,100 OVC being reached by Track 1.0 OVC partners for the period July-
September 2010 while the mission works on an APHIA III program design that will incorporate strategies for
ensuring continued service delivery to these OVC and their families.
3. CONTRIBUTIONS TO OVERALL PROGRAM AREA
The overall goal of this project is to improve the quality of life of 83,100 OVC and their families through the
continued provision of compassionate care and social support.
4. LINKS TO OTHER ACTIVITIES
This activity links to other Ministry of Health facilities, partners in the areas counseling and testing, home
based care and ART.
5. POPULATIONS BEING TARGETED
This activity will target orphans and vulnerable children, their family members and care givers, and will work
through FBO, CBO and other implementing partners.
6. KEY LEGISLATIVE ISSUES ADDRESSED
The key legislative issue being addressed is stigma and discrimination through enhanced medical and
psychological well being, and demonstrated improved quality of life. This activity also addresses the
wraparound issues of food security and economic strengthening.
7. EMPHASIS AREAS
The major area of emphasis is local organization capacity development and the minor area of emphasis is
community mobilization/participation.
New/Continuing Activity: New Activity
Continuing Activity:
Table 3.3.13:
