PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
N/A
New/Continuing Activity: New Activity
Continuing Activity:
Program Budget Code: 19 - HVMS Management and Staffing
Total Planned Funding for Program Budget Code: $1,550,500
Total Planned Funding for Program Budget Code: $0
Program Area Narrative:
Under the leadership of the Ambassador, USG agencies maintain a core team of highly-skilled and dedicated national and
expatriate staff to effectively manage the implementation of the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief in Indonesia. With
limited budget and staff, the USG focus is on integrating with and supporting the GOI 2007-2010 National HIV/AIDS Strategic
Plan.
Current USG PEPFAR presence is comprised of STATE, USAID, and DOD managed by the Center of Excellence in Disaster
Management and Humanitarian Assistance. Each of these agencies maintains strong in-country relationships on HIV/AIDS.
HHS/CDC currently has full-time staff working on influenza and the HHS/CDC/GAP regional office in Bangkok provides support to
several countries in the region. Peace Corps is considering opening a program in Indonesia in 2009 contingent on funding and
could offer a unique opportunity at the community level.
Staffing for Results (SFR) is focused on assuring the comprehensive integration and support of the Government of Indonesia's
2007-2010 National HIV/AIDS Strategic Plan. The positions and functions included in the management and staffing budget are
essential to effective planning, implementation and monitoring of the Emergency Plan. STATE, through its ECON section, is
engaged with the PEPFAR process throughout the annual planning cycle. DOD activities and programs are managed by staff
located in PACOM/Hawaii, while in-country liaison is provided by the Office of Defense Cooperation. USAID coordinates the
Indonesia PEPFAR response and a collaborative interagency process is maintained through regular communications and field
visits.
At the $8 million base level for Indonesia, USAID will maintain 6 staff members working on PEPFAR for a total of 3.8 FTE. Two
FTE manage the program in entirety including all coordination aspects with OGAC and the individual agencies. This includes one
USPSC working 1.00 FTE and one FSN working 1.0 FTE. Other personnel include an FSN at 0.5 FTE and two FSNs at .15 FTE.
An additional 1.0 FTE FSN will be added in FY09 to assume a 50% level of effort on TBD implementing partner grant/contract
management and 50% level of effort on program monitoring, evaluation, data analysis, and PEPFAR reporting requirements, as
well as share increased coordination responsibilities with the GFATM.
USG staff provides critical technical assistance to the GOI MOH and National AIDS Commission (KPA) and are active members
of national level Technical Working Groups for HIV/AIDS. Additionally, USG representatives sit on the GFATM CCM and are
responsible for grant/contract management of our implementing partners. USG Indonesia will continue to rely on staff technical
expertise from USG personnel based in the United States to provide backstop support.
USAID has allocated $512,072 for management and staffing costs. ICASS costs are estimated at $14,004 and $6924 is being
levied for the IRM tax. The mission is not contributing to Capital Security Cost Sharing. DOD is allocating $17,500 of GHAI funds
to program management support for USPACOM/COE.
PEPFAR requirements create a significant management burden on posts, especially in non-focus countries with few PEPFAR
resources. This burden results in significant staff time managing interagency processes and reporting and reduces time managing
programs. This has potential to exacerbate vulnerabilities over time, particularly in an environment like Indonesia where corruption
is still a major issue. Further attempts to simplify, streamline and reconsider the administrative burdens imposed by these
processes would be greatly appreciated. While a differentiation of reporting requirements does exist between focus and non-
focus countries, this should be re-visited to better define the balance of reporting needed from other bilateral countries on the
basis of funding levels.
The Government of Indonesia (GOI) is pleased to work with USG on these and other issues, but they have expressed a desire for
increased partnership. They do not believe that US bilateral assistance investments, including PEPFAR, are consistent with the
principles of the Paris Declaration. To a great extent, GOI perceives the process and investment decisions are driven by
Washington and not by the development needs and priorities of Indonesia.
The proposed Partnership Compact presents an opportunity to offset this dynamic. In FY 2009, pending approval for a PEPFAR
Partnership Compact agreement in Indonesia, the USG will propose to hire additional staff to support development,
implementation and in-country coordination. The configuration of USG agencies would also be negotiated internally and with the
GOI to assure the best level of support. At minimum, a "Partnership Compact Liaison" position is envisioned as a 1.00 FTE. This
new position would assume the primary role and responsibility of coordinating the USG and coordinating with the GOI to ensure a
smooth and effective negotiation of the Partnership Compact as well as the subsequent implementation of related compact
activities. The Partnership Compact Liaison, along with all USG staff, will work with other donors, particularly the GFATM and UN
agencies, Indonesia Partnership Fund, AusAID, and the World Bank to ensure that overall PEPFAR efforts are most effective, are
not duplicative of current efforts, are aligned with the National HIV/AIDS Strategy, and support the GOI's priorities in HIV/AIDS.
Table 3.3.19:
