PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
N/A
New/Continuing Activity: New Activity
Continuing Activity:
Program Budget Code: 17 - HVSI Strategic Information
Total Planned Funding for Program Budget Code: $190,000
Total Planned Funding for Program Budget Code: $0
Program Area Narrative:
The USG plays a critical role in assisting the Government of Indonesia (GOI) to strengthen Strategic Information (SI) activities by
collaborating with MOH and other international donors. Such collaboration is required while the GOI continues to develop the
capacity to take the lead in surveillance, data collection, and monitoring and evaluation processes. In FY08, the USG SI plan is
focused on providing technical assistance and capacity building for implementation of the National Monitoring & Evaluation
Framework at national and sub-national level in line with the Indonesia National HIV/AIDS Strategy. The USG will advise GOI and
NGO counterparts at both the national and provincial levels to undertake in-depth analyses and advocate the use of evidence-
based data for strategic planning and decision-making. As an integral part of USG prevention program implementation focused on
MARP, the USG continues to support the assessment of pilot sites implementing the general population Continuum of Prevention-
to-Care (CoPC) model and the integrated MARP sexual transmission prevention package model that includes Periodic
Presumptive Treatment (PPT) for STI for MARP. The USG will advocate and seek to leverage other resources from GOI and/or
international donors for potential national scale-up of successful models. Sustainability is a key component of the SI strategy and
the USG will focus on building local capacity for M&E with an emphasis on data quality and data use for performance
management and program quality improvement for NGOs, C/FBOs, and government at all levels.
USG Indonesia continues to refine the reporting system (that was developed in 2007) containing indicators that are aligned with
PEPFAR requirements. With recognition of the different stages of HIV epidemic in Indonesia, USG continues to work closely with
USAID partners to use the expanded program monitoring system which allows USG to disaggregate accomplishments by
provinces, particularly in Papua where the epidemic is generalized versus other provinces where it is still a concentrated epidemic
particularly among MARP. In addition, USG partners utilize the software and program monitoring system to keep track of
individuals served at delivery sites to avoid double counting. This information is useful in order to monitor the intensity of the
various interventions or monitor the quality of coverage targeting MARP.
Indonesia serves as a model for effective collaboration and leveraging of resources to implement its HIV/AIDS program. However,
a weak MOH continues to rely heavily on TA and financial resources from the USG implementing partners, as well as other
international, multi-lateral agencies including: GFATM, The World Bank, WHO, AusAID, DfID, and UNAIDS for strategic
information/monitoring and evaluation activities. The M&E Technical Working Group was established in 2007 and continues to
actively move forward "The Third One" (one national M&E system) agenda. National core indicators have been developed and
finalized. The National AIDS Commission (KPA) continues to use the unified data collection tools and systems to collect national
core indicators including information from facility level and community-based systems. This system was based on the FHI/ASA
program monitoring system.
To date, USG's partners have produced quarterly progress reports based on data from monthly reports from implementing
agencies, monthly program site visits and routine coordination meetings. Continued technical support was provided to
implementing sub-partners to assure proper functioning of the overall program monitoring system. Technical and financial support
was provided for development of the national M&E database maintained by National AIDS Commission. Analysis of the 2007
IBBS data was completed, and full dissemination of these data for measuring program effects and future program planning has
just taken place. Work also began on developing a comprehensive quality assurance/quality improvement system with a pilot of
the system completed and broader implementation scheduled.
In FY09, proposed USG supported monitoring and evaluation activities include:
• Technical Assistance on developing unified VCT, STI, ART, and community-based programs and systems. This activity will
leverage funds for implementation in collaboration with KPA, Ministry of Health (MOH), and other donors particularly Global Fund
and AusAID. The recent Round 8 award alleviates some of the funding pressure, although technical assistance for quality SI
becomes critical. In FY09, the USG TA will focus on improving a record-keeping system to manage individual patients on
palliative care and monitor the scale-up of ART services.
• Encourage the effective implementation of the M&E framework and corresponding M&E information management system at sub-
national level.
• Support development and implementation of capacity-building module including trainings for district and provincial staff to
develop a provincial M&E framework, how to effectively operate the information management system, and how to use data for
decision-making, strategic planning, and program improvement.
• Although the specifics of the next USG HIV program are yet to be determined due to the TBD procurement, USG will continue to
support routine monitoring and reporting as well as develop rigorous program evaluation for any new prevention and care and
support models developed with an emphasis on determining effectiveness in the new HIV program design.
Potential contributions include,
* Use assessment findings from pilot sites implementing the CoPC model to improve program implementation and planning.
Support the replication of the model in other priority provinces/districts as appropriate by leveraging of resources from other
donors, GOI.
* Use assessment findings of the PPT implementation as a part of the sexual transmission prevention package model to improve
program implementation and planning. Support the replication of the model in other priority provinces/districts as appropriate by
leveraging of resources from other donors, GOI.
Building M&E capacity with local NGOs and C/FBOs is a fundamental component of the USG program for sustainability. By
strengthening local capacity for M&E, it ensures that local implementing partners collect high quality information for use in
program planning and improvement. In FY 2009, USG will continue to provide mentorship support to USAID partners and sub-
partners to improve routine program monitoring system for tracking individuals served as well as monitor intensity of intervention,
conduct training or refresher training on data quality, and build capacity of USAID sub-partners to effectively use data for
performance management and program quality improvement.
In FY09, USG would like to focus on use of surveillance data and support the continued strengthening of surveillance capacity of
GOI. The level of intensity for such activity will be dependent upon collaboration with other donors and the newly awarded GFATM
Round 8 proposal, as well as funding from any potential PEPFAR Partnership Compact. Illustrative activities are as follows:
• Technical support to the GOI for the continued dissemination of the IBBS findings.
• General surveillance TA to GOI for strengthening bio-behavioral surveillance, updating size estimations among MARP using the
most recent IBBS data in 2008. If needed, work with KPA and MOH, to conduct primary data collection in order to improve
accuracy of the estimations as well as support the GOI to convene a consensus building workshop among all stakeholders.
• Continuation of TA to GOI for general data analyses and data use activities, such as secondary data analyses and synthesis
activities at national level using existing surveillance data as well as routine program data from various sources to triangulate
information and identify outcomes/impacts of collective responses to combat HIV/AIDS among MARP in Indonesia as well as
identify gaps for future program improvement.
• Work with GOI to conduct analysis of the qualitative assessment of transactional sexual behavior and sexual networks among
general population in Papua (conducted 2008). This information will be critical for interpretation of recent Papua IBBS results,
improvement of IBBS methodology, and for improving intervention strategy.
• Continuation of TA to develop TB/HIV passive surveillance to the GOI. This activity will be an integral part of TB/HIV program
implementation.
• Collaborate with the other global, multi-lateral donors in the creation and support of a "Global Donors Surveillance Advisory
Group" to work closely with the MOH, KPA, National Surveillance Technical Working Group, and GFATM on the national
surveillance strategy as well as develop a plan for the continuity and quality of second generation surveillance activities in
Indonesia.
• A new priority for DOD activities will be to include support for SI. Funding will be used to enhance the in-country monitoring and
evaluation skills of TNI and provide a level of quality assurance for all program activities.
During the Mini-COP development process, all program area targets and target justifications were developed by the integrated
USG Indonesia SI Team. Because of the TBD procurement process, the USG SI Team held general discussions with USAID
partners to get current information regarding their programs in order to set downstream and upstream targets for FY 2009 based
on their projected FY 2008 program results. Information was also obtained from KPA and UNAIDS on updated national level
reporting data. Additionally, a meeting was held with the KPA to understand future directions for the national SI activities and
GFATM priorities.
USG Indonesia currently does not have dedicated SI staff in country. In FY 2009, the USG team proposes to hire an additional
FSN Program Specialist who will work part-time on program management and part-time on SI/M&E related activities (see also the
Management & Staffing section).
Finally, a successful Partnership Compact agreement will allow USG to work with GOI and GFATM to provide focused
surveillance TA for the next rounds of IBBS among general population in Tanah Papua and IBBS among MARP across Indonesia.
USG will also support all M&E requirements related to the Partnership Compact itself.
Table 3.3.17: