PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
PARTNER: Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health
Title of Study:
Effectiveness of food by prescription programs for severely malnourished HIV+ patients
Time and Money Summary:
Expected timeframe: 1 year, Budget Year 1: $90,000
Local Co-Investigator:
Dr. Solomon Gashu, Medical Director, St. Peter's Specialized Tuberculosis Hospital
Project Description:
Nutritional support is considered an essential part of a comprehensive HIV/AIDS package. Data indicate
that nutrient intake can improve ART absorption and is associated with medication adherence among ART
patients. Studies have shown that moderate to severe malnutrition (Body Mass Index, or BMI<17) at the
time of starting ART and severe anemia are independent predictors of mortality and likewise screening and
managing malnutrition among PLWH starting ART has survival benefits. USG partner Johns Hopkins
University (JHU) Technical Support For The Ethiopia HIV/AIDS ART Initiative has developed a plan to
introduce a food by prescription program (FBP) at the ART clinic at St. Peters' Specialized Tuberculosis
(TB) Hospital in Addis Ababa. Food by Prescription provides therapeutic and supplemental food to patients
on ART, pregnant or lactating HIV+ women, and HIV exposed children. A baseline nutritional assessment
of ART clients and then follow-up assessment after 6 months of nutritional support will be undertaken.
Change in body mass index, CD4 count, functional status, opportunistic infections and mortality, will be
compared to a historical cohort of patients that did not receive nutritional interventions.
Evaluation Question:
This proposal will address the following questions:
1) What are the baseline nutritional indices for patients about to start ART?
2) How do these indices vary by TB/HIV co-infection?
3) Does an intensive six month FBP intervention for severely malnourished patients improve patient
outcomes as measured by decreased mortality and morbidity?
4) What is the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of the FBP program?
Programmatic Importance:
Achieving food security and appropriate nutritional support is difficult in environments such as Ethiopia that
have been long plagued by food insecurity. This problem is especially evident among patients who are co-
infected with HIV and tuberculosis. For example, registry data of ART patients at St. Peters Specialized TB
hospital indicate that 19% of patients weigh less than 40 kilograms (kg) at the start of ART and 3% of adults
weigh less than 30 kg. In an analysis of survival, underweight patients had an increased risk of dying in the
first year of follow-up after initiating ART.
The currently measured early mortality rate among the Ethiopia national program is close to 10%; however
rates are as high as 14% among TB/HIV infected patients. Follow-up data indicate that this mortality occurs
usually within the first three months; however, a second peak occurs between 8-12 months and is likely due
to immune reconstitution. We believe much of this early mortality may be associated with severe
malnutrition, anemia and co-infections with subclinical opportunistic infections. Once patients start ART,
many report poor adherence due to the lack of consistent food and subsequent gastro-intestinal distress
with the medications. Providing patients with food supplementation and therapeutic feeding during this
early phase of ART initiation is likely to reduce this early mortality rate and will hopefully lead to improved
medication adherence. This is important for the overall program to reduce the development of resistance
from poor adherence and to encourage more patients to accept ART even when severely debilitated. It will,
as well, lead to patients who more quickly return to a functional status and have improved quality of life.
Methods:
1) Baseline nutritional assessment among pre-ART patients ready to start ART at St. Peters: A standard
nutritional questionnaire and nutritional screening tool (including BMI, mid-upper arm circumference and
diet review) will be developed and administered to all patients found eligible for ART, pregnant and lactating
HIV+ women and HIV+ and exposed children. Patients will be coded according to level of malnutrition with
severe malnutrition defined as BMI < 17. For children, standard z-scores will be used to assess
malnutrition. Any person with severe malnutrition will be offered the FBP intervention at the time of initiating
ART. A sample size of 200 is expected over the 12 month period of intervention; however all consecutive
patients who qualify will be enrolled into the study.
2) Food By Prescription Intervention: JHU will partner with the Ethiopian national FBP program with other
PEPFAR partners, UNICEF and other partners. This program will provide intensive therapeutic and
supplemental nutritional support, including ready to use therapeutic foods (RUTF) such as fortified flours
(e.g. First foods, Advantage or Foundation plus), prepared feeding (e.g. F75, F100), and biscuits and
PlumpyNut for children. Additionally, safe water will be secured for all patients in the program to avoid
diarrheal diseases. Counseling and education regarding local foods and nutrition will be conducted.
3) Evaluation of outcomes: After the patients have received 6 months of the food intervention and ART, and
evaluation of outcomes will be made. Comparison of change in weight, BMI, z-scores, CD4, and number of
opportunistic infections, loss to follow-up and death will be made between the patients receiving the FBP
support and a historical cohort at St. Peters with similar low weight who did not receive nutritional
intervention. Likewise, comparisons can be made with other ART programs that have not yet initiated the
FBP program. Factors associated with the outcomes of interest will be compared between the intervention
and comparison groups and independent risks measured using the chi-square and t-test analyses.
Multivariate analyses will be performed to identify independent risk factors while controlling for confounders,
such as TB/HIV co-infection or immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS).
Activity Narrative: 4) Cost effectiveness: Costs for the FBP program will be compared to costs related to early mortality and
morbidity avoided with the intervention program.
Population of Interest:
The populations of interest are HIV+ clients, pregnant and lactating HIV+ women, HIV+ and exposed
children attending ART clinic who are severely malnourished and/or eligible for food by prescription
Information Dissemination Plan:
Stakeholders include the Ministry of Health (MOH), Addis Ababa Regional Health Bureau, local non-
governmental organizations and faith-based organizations working in these communities, health care
providers, PEPFAR and other entities involved in the support of health care delivery. In the planning phase
of the evaluation, stakeholders meetings will be organized to describe the goals of the evaluation.
Stakeholders will be involved in review of the assessment form and the indicators to measure malnutrition.
MOH personnel will be involved in the gathering of data and review of findings. Results will be
disseminated in a review meeting for the region and findings will be shared with PEPFAR and other
partners.
Budget Justification for Year One Budget:
Baseline & follow-up survey
Coordinator (responsible for developing assessment, training assistants, standardization)$10,000
Dietary and nutritional assessment survey assistants - $15,000
Materials - $1,500
Transportation (to and from evaluation site) - $1,500
Data collection, management and analysis - $15,000
Intervention
Materials (includes educational and training materials) - $10,000
FBP program covered by other PEPFAR partners
On-site Training (on FBP) - $5,000
Office supplies and forms - $2,500
Transportation (Coordinator to travel to site weekly) - $6,750
Miscellaneous costs, telecommunications - $1,000
Review and stakeholders meetings- $10,000
Subtotal - $75,290
Indirect Costs - 18.8%
Total - $90,000
New/Continuing Activity: Continuing Activity
Continuing Activity: 18834
Continued Associated Activity Information
Activity Activity ID USG Agency Prime Partner Mechanism Mechanism ID Mechanism Planned Funds
System ID System ID
18834 18834.08 HHS/Centers for Johns Hopkins 7485 3787.08 Support for $90,000
Disease Control & University program
Prevention Bloomberg School implementation
of Public Health
through US-
based
universities in
the FDRE
Table 3.3.11:
Title of Study: Public Health Evaluation of Training of Health Providers in Health PEPFAR funded health
centers in Ethiopia
The evaluation will be conducted from April 2008 to March 2009, pending clearance of the revised protocol,
and is expected to cost $150,000 for Year 2.
Local Co-Investigator: Marion McNabb, Mesrak Nadew, Yassir Abduljewad, Anne Pfitzer, Dr Anteneh
Worku, Petros Faltamo
Project Description
The availability of trained and competent service providers in delivering quality HIV/AIDS services is of
utmost importance in the Ethiopian context. Ethiopia's single point HIV prevalence is 2.1%, which translates
into a target of 350,000 eligible for ART in order to obtain the universal access for ART by 2010. The
Ministry of Health's 2005-06 publication "Health and Health Related Indicators" reported that there is one
physician for every 35,493 people and one nurse for every 4,207 people in Ethiopia. The numbers are
significantly below the WHO international standards for physicians with the standards set at one physician
for 10,000 people and near to the nurse ratio of one nurse for every 5,000 people making access to regular
healthcare services by skilled
There have been multiple reports of high attrition of health care providers in Ethiopia. The resources and
efforts put into PEPFAR training have been enormous. It is important to provide measurable information and
assess training effectiveness periodically. In the context of the Ethiopian scale up of ART services, health
centers were recently added as service provision sites. COP08 will be an opportune time to review the
effectiveness of training programs at this health facility-level to refine strategies for the future.
Status of study/progress to date
In FY07, JHPIEGO was funded to conduct an evaluation that will provide feedback to PEPFAR Ethiopia
regarding the effectiveness and cost of investments to train health care workers at facilities. The evaluation
included descriptive review of training processes and methodologies utilized by PEPFAR implementing
partners employing a quasi-experimental data collection methods to assess the performance of trained and
untrained providers(either on the job or in a simulation) on specific knowledge and skills included in the in-
service training they received. Additionally, the evaluation measured the attrition rates and reasons for
attrition.
The main evaluation questions were:
1) What proportion of health care workers who have attended training funded under PEPFAR are still in the
post they were in at the time of training?
2)Where are the providers that left the facilities?
3)How effectively are health care workers performing on specific skills for which they were trained?
4)What was the average training cost per trainee, by category of knowledge and skills of the training event?
What is the anticipated cost for re-training providers?
5)How are the PEPFAR trainers being used within the program and how many training events have they
conducted?
6)What is the perceived risk of HIV infection in providers trained versus providers not trained in providing
HIV services?
JHPIEGO reviewed PEPFAR Ethiopia's Training Information Management Information System (TIMS) for
data on providers trained in HIV/AIDS services to identify the population of health care workers trained by
PEPFAR in all areas of prevention, care and treatment at hospitals. Accordingly, data were collected from
selected but representative cohort hospitals in Ethiopia. Due to funding limitations in COP 07 the sample
only included hospitals.
The skills of trained providers were evaluated by comparing skills that providers are expected to have post-
training versus skills that are displayed at the time of assessment using standardized case study
assessment tools which were developed using competencies agreed upon in Ethiopia and all PEPFAR
Ethiopia Training Partners reviewed and approved the tools.
Surveys were distributed to PEPFAR Ethiopia's university partners to determine the costs of training. The
protocol was finalized and submitted for the CDC Institutional Review Board approval.
Planned FY08 Activities:
In COP08, JHPIEGO proposes another Training Evaluation with a similar study design and the same
objectives, but with a protocol targeting staff at health centers. The evaluation will assess similar elements
as the hospital version collected: including trainers, cost, and competency of providers and attrition rates of
providers at the health center level. The selection of health centers will be confined to those networked to
hospitals. JHPIEGO will work closely and collaborate with implementing partners that have trained staff at
health center level in refining the protocol and evaluation tools, including US agencies and
international/local partners. The evaluation of training effectiveness will provide useful information across all
PEPFAR funded training programs; working closely with PEPFAR partners on the evaluation will bring
greater impact. The availability of trained and competent service providers in delivering quality HIV/AIDS
services is of utmost importance in the Ethiopian context. Ethiopia's single point HIV prevalence is 2.1%
which translates into a target of 350,000 eligible for ART in order to obtain the universal access for ART by
2010. In 2005/06 the Ministry of Health document "Health and Health Related Indicators" that there is one
healthcare services by skilled providers limited for a significant proportion of Ethiopians.
Activity Narrative: The findings can be used by HAPCO and the Human Resource Department of Ministry of Health, Regional
Health Bureaus, and PEPFAR partners that invest in in-service training for capacity building. The study will
also inform retention strategies with a specific focus on the needs of health centers
Budget Justification for FY08 monies:
Given experience to date and the breadth of the proposed FY08 scope of work, the study is budgeted at
$150,000 in COP08. The funding will be used for protocol development, recruitment of data collectors,
training of data collectors, data collection and supervision, data cleaning, entry and analysis, dissemination,
salaries of staff, other direct costs and Johns Hopkins University financial and administration costs.
This is a continuing activity in COP 08 originally planned with JHPIEGO-E as Prime Partner. It was
erroneously entered in the databasewith JHU -Bloomberg as prime partner. The activity is to conduct a
targeted evaluation on the effectiveness of Training for staff at Health Centers under PEPFAR -E. The
findings of the evaluation will provide useful information across all PEPFAR funded training programs ,
partners and stakeholders to identify the retention and attrition status of trained health care providers.
JHPIEGO-E is a prime partner which has a strong potential in conducting targeted evaluation. CDC-E will
provide guidance and follow up of the targeted evaluation.
Continuing Activity: 18789
18789 18789.08 HHS/Centers for Johns Hopkins 7485 3787.08 Support for $0
Table 3.3.14: