PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Local Evaluation Services Indefinite Quantity
Contract (IQC). The IQC was awarded to the following six South African
firms in July 2012 without a leader organization:
1. Khulisa Management Services,
2. DNA,
3. Southern Hermisphere,
4. University Research South Africa,
5. Grant Thornthon, and
6. Manto Management
This is a mechanism created to evaluate USAID/SA programs and help the
mission comply with the agency evaluation policy. The IQC provides
evaluation services for the Health Office , Regional Economic Growth
Office (REGO), Regional General Development Office (RGDO), Regional
HIV/AIDs Program Office (RHAP - including Lesotho and Swaziland), and
Botswana Office.
All new evaluation services under USAID/SA will be provided through this
mechanism provided the service required matches the IQC Scope of Work.
In line with the Evaluation Policy, evaluations are managed by the
Regional Program Office. The Program Office is finalizing clear guidance
on evaluations on the Mission Order for evaluations to be released soon.
The new guidance will explain the steps necessary to initiate an
evaluation under this IQC. Until that time, CORs are requested to
schedule a meeting with me or Erik Pacific or Lisa Campbell at least 5
months before the desired start date of your evaluation.
USAID/Southern Africa Evaluations Indefinite Quantity Contracts (IQCs) creates solutions for client missions that seek innovative approaches to address evaluation, assessment, and performance monitoring needs. The IQC will help missions comply with the new USAID Agency evaluation policy. The IQCs ensurs that evaluations conducted under these mechanism will serve two primary purposes: 1) providing accountability to stakeholders and 2) learning to improve aid effectiveness. All evaluations conducted under the Southern Africa Evaluation IQCs will be unbiased in measurement and reporting; relevant in terms of linking evaluation questions to specific future decision to be made by USAID leadership, partner governments, and other key stakeholders; based on best practices; oriented toward building local capacity; and transparent with a commitment to full and open disclosure of findings.
The objective of the regional IQCs is to strengthen the regions evaluation system to
1. Provide evaluation services for USAID/Southern Africa, which includes the USAIDs Bilateral and Regional Programs; the Botswana, Lesotho, and Swaziland PEPFAR-funded programs in a manner that permits timely access to appropriate evaluation expertise.
2. Support client missions in above-mentioned countries with an accessible evaluation mechanism.
South Africa has a large pool of well-trained and technically competent organizations that are capable of delivering the services required under the Regional Evaluations IQCs. In the past, USAID/Southern Africa has contracted with a number of local organizations and has received quality products and services. Additionally, utilizing local organizations may reduce language and culture related evaluation data quality problems which can bias the results. In addition to the above benefits, the use of local organizations are 1) consistent with USAID Forward reforms to engage local organizations, 2) more efficient in terms of time, administration and resource utilization and 3) can be more cost effective.
USAID Swaziland will buy into this mechanism to conduct a number of project evaluations over COP 13 including PACT.