PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Macro International provides technical assistance projects for health and development related surveys and research. The goal of this activity will be to design and implement a national 2010 AIDS Indicator Survey (name to be decided). This activity supports the strategic information component of the human and institutional capacity development pillar of the Partnership Framework (PF) and the response management thematic area of the NSF. Macro International works with local institutions, specifically the Central Statistical Office, building their capacity for the management of large, complex surveys. The survey will cover the entire national and will generate critical data for monitoring and directing the national HIV response. Cost savings will be achieved by relying on local institutions and human resources for most of the work.
Macro International will work with the Central Statistical Office (CSO) and the MOH to design and implement a national 2010 AIDS Indicator Survey (survey name to decided). The preparatory design work for the survey was to be completed in FY09 but was delayed by other scheduled survey on the work plan of CSO. The requested funds are in additional to the $800,000 requested in FY09. Taken together these funds will fully supported the technical assistance and part of the local costs related to survey conduct. The remaining costs will be borne by the GKOS and other assistance partners.
Outputs include:
1. High quality data to guide program decision-making and to meet reporting requirements in the areas of trends in HIV-risk related sexual behavioral, HIV and reproductive health related service utilization, household and community based impact mitigation, and adult mortality trends.
2. Build capacity in national institutions in the collection and use of high quality survey data. Together with the 2007 SDHS, implementation of the 2010 AIS will strengthen and focus the transference of key SI skills in the measurement and practical utilization of national program outcome and impact information for program improvement.
