PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
08-08 Reprogramming:This change reflects a shift in the funds used for paying for the Field Epidemiology
Training Program (FETP). Funds for FETP were originally budgeted in FY2007 GAP Base funds under
TBD. It has been determined that the Thailand MOPH - US CDC (TUC) Cooperative Agreement is the
appropriate mechanism for funding the FETP. However, funds can not be obligated during FY2008. The
proposed shift is to use FY2007 funds to pay for local guard services and to use FY2008 funds originally
budgeted for local guard services to replace the FETP funds. This will result in no changes in targets.
CDC pays three separate cost-of-doing-business charges to the Department of State. For FY 08, these are
as follows:
ICASS Charges for HHS/CDC GAP
This charge is for the administrative support given by Department of State service providers to HHS/CDC
GAP Cambodia. This estimate is based on the proposed ICASS budget for Post Phnom Penh, and on
current staffing levels for the Embassy. ICASS costs for CDC are determined in part on the basis of 4 direct
hire staff and 14 FSN staff. The estimated ICASS charge for FY 08 is $320,000.
Capital Security Cost Sharing
These funds are sent to the Department of State, OBO, to support new embassy compound construction.
For FY 08, this is reported to be $161,130.
Non-ICASS Residential Guard Service
Requested funding would cover the cost that the Department of State charges CDC GAP for non-ICASS
residential guard services. This was $78,000 in 2007, up from $38,000 in 2006, a 105% increase. Although
we do not anticipate an increase of this magnitude in FY 08, we do expect a 33% increase because direct
hire staff residences are increasing from 3 to 4 as of September 2007. We estimate the FY 08 cost to be
$104,000.
