PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Subdivisions of Program Areas, these track general higher level sub-classifications of expenditure.
Subdivisions of Major categories, these are the most detailed expenditure data.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Years of mechanism: 2010
These funds will continue to support FHI as the leading TA partner supporting both NACP at the National level as well as providing TA to all community care and support implementing partners. FHI will support NACP in the revision of HBC trainings reflecting the changes in the newly revised guidelines, one of the key outcomes for this review is to have an intergrated competency-based training which includes all ongoing initiatives like; Prevention with Positives (PwP), Palliative Care and the Recording and Reporting System (RRS) for HBC. FHI will continue to provide TA on strengtherning the role of District home-based care coordinators (DHBCC). In FY2011 FHI will work to synthesize from the different assessments aimed at reviews of service delivery models and raise with NACP the key policy considerations in the review of guidelines. FHI will continus to support community partners in intergrating PwP into their programs. The increase in funding in 2011 for $250,000 will support intergration of PwP programs. This is a National program.
1) Continue to provide technical support to national USG implementing partners; DSW, ZNZ,PM0 -RALG and the local government authority to intensify efforts for effective implementation, coordination and quality assurance of national OVC policies, strategies, guidelines, operational plans and developed systems. 2) Develop an exit strategy for the national USG staff to ensure a smooth transition of the techinical capacity to GoT. 3) Develop the national PSW training guideline and support GoT to coordinate with AIHA/ISW, Intrahealth and other stakeholders to develop the national social welfare workforce strategy.
Support the National AIDS Control Programme to better plan, coordinate, and manage care and treatment programs. The focus of the program is national. Also, to support the implementation of key HR policies to support programs, particularly task shifting