PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Years of mechanism: 2011
RTI will provide technical assistance to NIMR to ensure that the identified national research and evaluation agenda priority items have been initiated. RTI will also provide technical assistance to facilitate cross organization coordination with TACAIDS and other stakeholders. RTI technical assistance will result in enhanced data management at NIMR Mwanza and improved use of research findings.
RTI technical assistance will support the production of a routine monitoring framework that tracks progress in data management, IRB performance, protocol writing, research report writing and data dissemination and use. Funding for RTI support to NIMR has been reduced by 41% in line with the overall SI reduction.
Moved funding from Mechanism 31 to Mechanism 14 in order to combine mechanisms for a single partner
RTI will be supporting implementation of the National Research and Evaluation Agenda by strengthening the ethics boards at the national and local levels. Also they will continue to support evaluation and research capacity building by training HCWs in areas of public health evaluation.
AB component of review will improve and harmonize USG prevention program M&E tools, including potential introduction and integration of outcome measurements where possible, creating linkages and harmonization with national monitoring systems where possible.
OP component of review, improvement and harmonization of USG prevention program M&E tools, including potential introduction and integration of outcome measurements where possible. Linkage and harmonization with national monitoring systems where possible.
MOBIS will continue to conduct PMTCT costing study and will carry out midterm/end-of-the-year evaluation to document program performance ($ 200,000).