PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
TITLE: Male Circumcision Situational Analysis, Results Dissemination and Advocacy Efforts
NEED and COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE: Evidence of the effectiveness of male circumcision as an HIV
prevention intervention has been met with great excitement, and this intervention is being considered for
implementation and scale-up in communities with high rates of HIV infection and low rates of circumcision of
male circumcision. However, it is also widely acknowledged that scaling up of this intervention is
complicated by various factors that require careful evaluation. These include the following: religious, cultural
and societal beliefs and norms; the fact that male circumcision is not 100% effective and thus it must be
combined with other known effective HIV prevention methodologies (e.g. consistent use of male or female
condoms and treatment of sexually transmitted infections); and the procedure that may be associated with
potential adverse events.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS: A potential partner has been identified for this activity and pending official
reprogramming approval from OGAC and CDC, the situational analysis can begin using WHO draft
assessment tools.
ACTIVITIES: In order to appropriately plan for possible implementation and scale-up of male circumcision in
Tanzania, careful assessments are needed. FY 2008 funds are requested to finalize assessments to guide
male circumcision policy development and planning for future service delivery in Tanzania. Assessments
will be conducted to determine: the prevalence and acceptability of male circumcision; the feasibility and
current capacity of the Tanzanian medical infrastructure to delivery male circumcision services; the current
policy environment; and the associated costs with male circumcision. The assessments will be designed
and carried out by a TBD partner with assistance from the PEPFAR male circumcision task force.
WHO/UNAIDS tools will be adapted and used for assessment activities.
In order to determine acceptability of male circumcision, focus group discussions and surveys were initiated
with FY 2007 funds in Kagera and Kigoma, regions where there is high prevalence of HIV infection and low
rates of male circumcision. In FY 2008, focus will be on completing the assessments focusing on:
demographic characteristics, health status, social characteristics, sexual behaviors, knowledge of male
circumcision and its effect on HIV acquisition, perceived benefits and risks, other attitudes regarding this
procedure, and anticipated effects on sexual behavior.
Prior to initiation of specific activities, appropriate human subjects review will be obtained at the TBD partner
organization, in Tanzania and at CDC.
To determine feasibility of scale-up of male circumcision, the TBD partner will conduct facility surveys. The
survey instrument will be developed to determine facility readiness to provide adult male circumcision as
well as the necessary post-operative care. Cost of the procedure including post-operative care will be
determined based on information collected through survey instruments. This will be developed through
collaboration with a health economist. Cost per case averted will be calculated.
A meeting of key stakeholders including the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MHSW) staff will be
organized upon completion of the project. Data from every aspect of the effort will be shared including
feasibility, acceptability, and costs. In addition, materials and tools developed for the purpose of scale-up of
this intervention will be also shared with meeting attendees. All information will be collated in a compendium
for use by stakeholders and other interested parties.
At the request of the MHSW, educational material may be developed with key messages appropriate for
potential candidates for male circumcision and their sexual partners. The key messages will be carefully
developed and will need to highlight accurate information regarding the protective effect of male
circumcision, need for continued use of other preventive behaviors (e.g. condom use), risks and benefits of
the procedure, appropriate post-operative wound management and the need to abstain from sex until
certified complete incision healing.
LINKAGES: The situational analysis and assessments will be conducted in facilities and regions supported
by USG care and treatment partners. Data from every aspect of the effort will be shared with these partners
including feasibility, acceptability and costs. In addition, materials and tools developed for purpose of scale-
up of this intervention will be also shared.
CHECK BOXES: Gender: addressing male norms and behaviors
Male circumcision
Adults (men and women 25 and over)
Discordant couples
M&E:
As progress towards actual implementation begins, the TBD partner will advocate for the development of a
single sentinel surveillance and reporting system.
SUSTAINABILITY: The focus of this activity is to collect data that will be used to shape national policy on
male circumcision, which will ultimately shape a sustainable male circumcision program in Tanzania.