Detailed Mechanism Funding and Narrative

Years of mechanism: 2012 2013 2014

Details for Mechanism ID: 14735
Country/Region: Mozambique
Year: 2014
Main Partner: Johns Hopkins University
Main Partner Program: Bloomberg School of Public Health
Organizational Type: University
Funding Agency: USAID
Total Funding: $0 Additional Pipeline Funding: N/A

NOTE: The following is taken from summaries released by PEPFAR on the PEPFAR Data Dashboard. They are incomplete summary paragraphs only and do not contain the full mechanism details. When the full narratives are released, we will update the mechanism pages accordingly.

Project Search Johns Hopkins University was funded in COP09 and COP10 (at a total of 1,000,000 (500,000 at each COP cycle) to implement an evaluation of the impact on behavior change and risk reduction of three PEPFAR funded implementing mechanisms around the reduction of multiple and concurrent partner reduction campaigns. JHU implemented the mid-term evaluation of the project in FY11 and released the findings of the evaluation. Overall the finding from the evaluation were positive, with changes in reported behaviors around the number of people counseled and tested and condom use. Additional analysis of the mid-term results are in process and additional secondary analysis will be released in November 2011. The end-of-project evaluation will take place in early FY13. Because of the pipeline from the last two fiscal years, there is no new funding for this activity in FY 12.

Mechanism Allocation by Budget Code for Selected Year
Sexual Prevention: Other Sexual Prevention (HVOP) $0
Mechanism Target Information

Since COP2014, PEPFAR no longer produces narratives for every mechanism it funds. However, PEPFAR has now included performance targets or indicator information for each mechanism based on the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) system. The MER guidance is available on PEPFAR's website Note that COP years 2014-2015 were under a previous version of the MER system and the indicators and definitions may have changed as of the new 2.0 guidance.

This mechanism has no published performance targets or indicators.