PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Years of mechanism: 2010 2011
Goals and Objectives:
2007 KAIS data indicates that the overall prevalence of HIV among the youth ages 1524 is 3.8%, with young women contracting HIV at a much higher rate than young men. By 24 years old, women are 5.2 times more likely to be infected than men of the same age (12% versus 2.6%). This intervention will support development and quality improvement on USAID Kenya's youth program. The objectives of which are (a) Support interventions that provide evidence of impact of youth prevention programs.; (b) define best practices for replicable in and out of school youth prevention programs that are linked to care and treatment; (c) coordinate mapping of youth activities by USG-funded partners to build synergy, provide adequate service coverage, and avoid duplication of efforts.
The intervention will focus on the following result areas:
Result 1: Strengthen programs and bring to scale with efficient combination prevention interventions that include theory driven; evidence-based behavioral, bio-medical, and structural interventions
Result 2: Use current epidemiological data to guide targeting and programming
Result 3: Support implementation, coordination, and monitoring of Kenya National AIDS Strategic Plan 2009-2013 KNASP-III
How does this link to Partnership Framework Goals:
The Partnership Framework focuses on supporting evidence-based approaches promoting abstinence among youth as well as partner reduction and correct and consistent condom use. Proven behavioral interventions target the sources of new infections and most at risk groups. Policies are established or strengthened to support effective HIV responses and mitigate societal norms or cultural practices that impede programming.
The intervention for the Youth HIV Combined Prevention Program is in sync with the Partnership Framework as it will provide evidence of the youth prevention interventions and recommendations for implementation to achieve high impact in terms of reducing new infections, providing linkages and increased involvement for youth living positively with care and treatment.
Geographic coverage and target populations:
This will be a national intervention targeting youth in and out of school and participants in youth development, mentoring and parental programs. The intervention will look at mass media interventions that deliver prevention messages through radio and other media. It will target 16,200 primary school teachers, 4,500 secondary school teachers, and 50,000 youth in tertiary institutions.
Cross-cutting programs and key issues:
The key approaches in the intervention include but not limited to the following:
1. Mass media interventions that deliver age-relevant sexual health and HIV prevention information and are designed to challenge norms which inhibit risk reduction behaviors.
2. Health interventions that train service providers and make clinics more 'youth friendly' with activities in the community and involvement of other sectors e.g. education.
3. Long term involvement of youth in programs to develop a pipeline of leadership for social innovation and provide mechanisms for successful BCC for young people and adults at high risk.
4. Target periods of transition like school holidays and transition to higher levels of school.
IM strategy to become more cost-efficient over time (e.g. coordinated service delivery, PPP, lower marginal costs, etc)
The outcome from this intervention will assist USG and GOK to prioritize areas within the youth program with the aim of averting new infections. This will enable partners to network with other partners and work together to advocate for increased prevention funding to implement proven and emerging prevention interventions among the youth. The intervention will also contribute to maintaining a high-level focus on the youth prevention agenda.
The mapping exercise will build synergy in service delivery and avoid duplication of interventions, both of which are essential in cost-efficient programming. The study will highlight evidence-based, replicable best-practices; this information will be used widely to develop programs that are effective and will reduce the need for costly trial-and-error prevention programming.
This will be a national intervention targeting the following populations (a) youth in and out of school (between ages 15 24), (b) youth development and mentoring programs; (c) parental programs. The mentors will be older well-trained youth and adults. The intervention will also look at mass media interventions that deliver age-relevant sexual health and HIV prevention information. The study will target 16,200 primary school teachers, 4,500 secondary school teachers and 50,000 youth in tertiary institutions, and will look specifically at USAID Kenya's youth program.
2007 KAIS data indicates that the overall prevalence of HIV among the youth ages 1524 is 3.8%, with young women contracting HIV at a much higher rate than young men. By 24 years old, women are 5.2 times more likely to be infected than men of the same age (12% versus 2.6%).
The intervention will (a) provide evidence as to whether the youth prevention programs are having a positive impact; (b) define best practices for replicable in and out of school youth prevention programs that are linked to care and treatment; (c) coordinate mapping of youth activities by USG-funded partners to build synergy, provide adequate service coverage, and avoid duplication of efforts.
The intervention will be carried out nationally.
The whole process will be well documented. The intervention will ensure there is a large and all inclusive sample size of the various target groups and control group. The outcome from the process will be shared widely and will be expected to inform youth programming.
The intervention for the Youth HIV Combined Prevention Program is in sync with the Partnership Framework as it will provide evidence of the youth prevention interventions and recommendations for implementation to achieve.
The intervention will define best practices for replicable in and out of school youth prevention programs that are linked to care and treatment; The process will also coordinate mapping of youth activities by USG-funded partners to build synergy, provide adequate service coverage and avoid duplication of efforts.
Budget allocation: Redacted
This will be a national intervention targeting the following populations (a) youth in and out of school (between ages 15 24),(b) youth development and mentoring programs; (c) parental programs. The mentors will be older well-trained youth and adults. (d)The intervention will also look at mass media interventions that deliver age-relevant sexual health and HIV prevention information. The activity will target 16,200 primary school teachers, 4,500 secondary school teachers and 50,000 youth in tertiary institutions.
This will be an intervention that will be working through different types of youth groups and adult mentors in and out of school.
2007 KAIS data indicates that the overall prevalence of HIV among the youth ages 1524 is 3.8%, with young women contracting HIV at a much higher rate than young men. By 24 years old, women are 5.2 times more likely to be infected than men of the same age (12% versus 2.6%). This intervention will support development and quality improvement process on USAID Kenya's youth program.
The intervention will (a)provide evidence as to whether the youth prevention programs are having a positive impact; (b)define best practices for replicable in and out of school youth prevention programs that are linked to care and treatment; (c)coordinate mapping of youth activities by USG-funded partners to build synergy, provide adequate service coverage, and avoid duplication of efforts.
The whole process will be well documented. The intervention will ensure there is a large and all inclusive sample size of the various target groups and control group. The outcome of this process will be shared widely and will be expected to inform youth programming.
