PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Years of mechanism: 2012 2013 2014 2015
As a follow up of IYCN program in Haiti, SPRING is expected to continue with the training of partners primarily PEPFAR partners but also USAID under FSHA Title II, partners in the EGE sector (particulatrly in the sector of agriculture) in the use of the tool kits developped by IYCN. SPRING will also ensure to keep disseminating the Guidelines on Infant and Young Child Nutrition and support the Ministry of Health in its IYCN program with its partners. SPRING will also work toward increasing the linkages between the community level and health facilities so better follow up and referral of malnourished children and adults can be achieved. With the development of NACS in some facilities this aspect of SPRING activities will be critical as monitoring and evaluation of nutrition program has been weak. Special effort will be deployed in the corridors with linkages to WFP interventiions and looking for synergy and complementarity of nutrition programs. Periodic field visits, workplan reviews, and regular reporting will be combined to ensure that programmatic deliverables are met timely.
Global Fund / Programmatic Engagement Questions
1. Is the Prime Partner of this mechanism also a Global Fund principal or sub-recipient, and/or does this mechanism support Global Fund grant implementation? No
SPRING will oversee the implementation of the data collection tool and provide training to health workers for NACS activities in the regions . SPRING will also facilitate linkages with community level and facility based activitties, particularly in the screening of malnourished children and proper referal for treatment. SPRING will continue to provide technical assistance to MOH in the area of infant and young child nutrition .
